We currently have the concordancia-gramatical. It would be helpful to have concordancia and agreement as synonyms. Apparently I can't set up the synonym relationship.
-
Will do as soon as I get a browser. In the meanwhile, do not add both of them, since it won't add any value– fedorquiCommented Apr 7, 2018 at 22:49
-
@fedorqui - No hurry and thanks. I wonder if "concordancia-gramatical" could be shortened to "concordancia."– aparente001Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 1:24
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
I just added the synonym agreement, which now maps to concordancia-gramatical.
Regarding concordancia, note that we also have concordancia-verbal, so we firstly should clarify when and how to use those [tag:concordancia-*]. I would personally go for removing concordancia-verbal and tagging those with concordancia + verbos. Let's comment on it.
-
I like your proposed solution -- narrow down a general concordancia tag with an additional tag such as verbos or adjetivos. Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 13:31
-
Re spanish.stackexchange.com/questions/3995/… -- are you saying you want me to go ahead and start making those changes? I hesitate to swamp the active list with too many tag changes at a time. What do you think would be best? Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 11:47
-
@aparente001 I am saying let's wait and see if others express their point of views. Interesting to check the discussion in Maximum number of edits at one time?: we are a small community and so many edits will indeed swamp the active list.– fedorquiCommented Apr 10, 2018 at 11:50
-
@fedorque - I was trying not to add "concordancia-gramatical" to all the agreement questions in one sitting. // Are you saying I should wait before replacing "concordancia-verbal" with "concordancia" plus "verbos"? Or are you saying I should not yet start adding any concordancia tags yet at all? I thought you meant the former but now I'm not sure.... Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 12:01
-
@aparente001 I am saying that let's not retag so much in one sitting and wait a bit to have more opinions in Meta before going on and doing things.– fedorquiCommented Apr 10, 2018 at 12:42
-
Sorry, I'm not getting it. Are you saying (A) I should wait before replacing "concordancia-verbal" with "concordancia" plus "verbos"? Or are you saying (B) I should not yet start adding any concordancia tags yet at all? Or something else entirely? Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 12:56
-
-
Thanks for clarifying. Whew! We have no disagreement about this. I have not touched the questions tagged with "concordancia-verbal" and have no intention of doing so in the near future. So, it looks like we're good on this score. Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 13:03
-
-
I didn't replace "concordancia-verbal" with "concordancia." Isn't that what (A) says? I'm totally lost, now, fedorqui, I do not understand what's bothering you. I'm starting to get that feeling you get when you try to make breakfast in someone else's kitchen and when your weekend host comes in and you realize from their body language that they really don't want anyone else doing anything in their kitchen. But I've checked what SE Meta has to say about best practices regarding tags, and I checked explicitly with you. You clarified that you meant (A). I just don't get it. Commented Apr 12, 2018 at 15:47