Timeline for Would our site like to contribute an opinion to a Meta.SE question about difficulties sites like ours have trying to graduate from Beta?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2019 at 20:38 | comment | added | aparente001 | @fedorqui - I see. I will post a Meta question about that. | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 9:18 | comment | added | fedorqui Mod |
aparente001 agreed with your last bit we need to start transitioning toward a greater degree of community moderation. We need more people to go through the /review section. Otherwise it is @Diego and me cleaning it up, which works in the meanwhile but just hides the underlying problem. We decided some time ago to not check it so often, but to me items in the review queue still take too long to be solved by the community (quite often it takes few days) and we tend to end up doing something in there.
|
|
| Feb 15, 2019 at 7:24 | comment | added | aparente001 | @Diego - Not sure if I understand your comment (question?) but I will say that I personally think we are not ready for graduation yet, and I also think that unless the required components can be tweaked I don't see how we can ever make it. Which I find discouraging. The measure I feel pessimistic about is the # of questions per day. // The reason I personally think we're not ready yet is that I think we need to start transitioning toward a greater degree of community moderation (I'm using "moderation" in a very broad sense) first. I don't know exactly how that can be promoted, though. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 3:14 | comment | added | Diego Mod | Thank you. I posted that comment precisely because it is getting confusing in the debate how we want to achieve graduation. I don't think that are any voices against graduation or against working to get more/better questions, answers, stats, etc. But the example of WritingSE is to request that the site gets graduated, in spite of not meeting the established criteria. They claim they are above a certain threshold and that that should be fine for them. I feel that is an aspect of the debate that seems not to be clear enough. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 0:37 | comment | added | aparente001 | @Diego - I'm not sure we are on opposite sides of an issue or debate. For example, "no es la graduación en sí lo que traería mejoras, sino los pasos para conseguir la graduación" is, I think, another way of stating what I was trying to get across. // I'm confused. Did I say or imply that the moderators were líderes? I didn't mean to. Let me try to clarify. My understanding is that as a Beta site works towards graduation, the community takes on more and more of the moderation, via community moderation. I'm saying that that is one of the positives that come with striving for graduation. | |
| Feb 11, 2019 at 15:45 | comment | added | Diego Mod | Los mods no somos "líderes". Somos usuarios bastante activos y tiramos un poco del carro (al igual que otros usuarios). Predicamos con el ejemplo, pero el puesto de mods no nos hace "líderes". No sé hasta que punto podemos pedir que nos ajusten a nuestro capricho los límites de privilegios. Como fedorqui ya ha explicado, muchas de las peticiones, especialmente en lo referente a infraestructura, tardan mucho en atenderse si es que acaso llegan a atenderse. Sigo pensando que no es la graduación en sí lo que traería mejoras, sino los pasos para conseguir la graduación. Son dos cosas distintas. | |
| Feb 11, 2019 at 5:39 | history | edited | aparente001 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
shared thoughts about "why does graduation matter to me?"
|
| Feb 7, 2019 at 19:46 | comment | added | Diego Mod | Coincido con que al sitio le va bien. Por eso yo no veo necesidad real en salir de beta. Podrías por favor ampliar un poco la respuesta añadiendo qué tendríamos si saliésemos de beta o qué querríamos tener en ese "tercer renglón"? Gracias. | |
| Feb 7, 2019 at 15:21 | history | answered | aparente001 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |